My Work History Is Being Held For Ransom

Dear J.T. & Dale: The company I work for hired an outside firm to handle employment verification. Now if I leave and get offered a new job, the verification company will demand that the prospective employer pay a $13 fee. I feel like my work history is being held for ransom. Why would an employer consider hiring me if they can get other people without the hassle? — Mike

J.T.: I have never heard of a company requiring payment for employment verification, although, believe it or not, I can see the business rationale. They probably have grown tired of performing functions that have no direct benefit to the company, and so decided to institute a fee, knowing that employers either would skip verification, or else pay the fee and thus the company would be compensated for the time involved.

Dale: Perhaps the solution is for you to pay the “ransom,” Mike. If you warn a future employer about the fee, and offer to pay it, I can’t imagine them holding your former employer’s actions against you. In fact, it might help them appreciate why you left the old company; it could even create that bond that springs up when two people are both annoyed by the same stupid policy.


Jeanine “J.T.” Tanner O’Donnell is a professional development specialist and founder of CAREEREALISM.com. Dale Dauten’s latest book is “(Great) Employees Only: How Gifted Bosses Hire and De-Hire Their Way to Success” (John Wiley & Sons). Please visit them at www.jtanddale.com, where you can send questions via e-mail, or write to them in care of King Features Syndicate, 300 W. 57th St, 15th Floor, New York, NY 10019.

© 2009 by King Features Syndicate, Inc.

2 Responses

  1. Teena Rose Says:

    I agree with JT in that I see why company’s are seeking ways to transform mundane admin tasks into profit channels. But, it’s obviously a new practice (I’ve never heard of it being done until now) … and with anything new, there’s question as to the overall effect and longevity of it.

    Thinking about it further, the practice is a bit oxymoron, isn’t it? The company looking to make $13 for employment verification will likely find themselves paying $13 to verify their own employment candidates. Seems like a lot of fees changing hands unnecessarily.

    Also, the fee is small … what profit is really being made once the additional admin time is spent on accounting/invoicing/fee collection.

    Regards,
    @teenarose

  2. clinton Says:

    sensible@stonehenge.baffled” rel=”nofollow” onclick=”javascript:pageTracker._trackPageview (’/outbound/google.com’);”>.…

    tnx….

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.